The M4 profile barrel (shown below) is 14.5" long. Most AR15's will feature a 16" barrel to comply with federal law, but you can also have an extended muzzle device permanently attached to your 14.5" barrel that will bring its total length to the legal limit.
Mil-spec barrels are made from 4150 chrome-moly vandium steel per MIL-B-11595E. I'm no metallurgist, and I don't imagine most of you are either, so here's a "Barney-style" thread about barrel steel. Most quality AR makers disclose what materials they use on their website.
The notch that you see in the barrel profile between the muzzle and the FSB is pointless for most civilians. Its purpose is to accomodate the attachment band on an under-barrel grenade launcher. Unless you plan to mount your registered M203 or a 37mm flare launcher this feature may be something that you can overlook.
Next you have the front sight base/gas block. Many end-users choose to replace the factory FSB with a low-profile gas block so that they can run a longer rail system out over it. If you choose to stick with a standard FSB/GB there are a few features that you may want. First, you should make sure that your AR15 has been equipped with a correct-height FSB. A flat-top upper with an optic rail requires a different height FSB than an A2 style upper with a fixed carry handle. If your AR15 has a flat-top ensure that your FSB is marked with an "F" like the one below.
The FSB should be pinned in place using taper pins. Their tapered contour will ensure that they do not back out. Some manufacturers may not use taper pins, so this may be a good question for you to ask when shopping. Most gun store employees will not know the answer to this question, so you may be best served by giving the manufacturer's CS dept a call and asking them instead. Many aftermarket FSB's/GB's feature shoddy attachment methods, such as clamp-on FSB's. These are not ideal and should have Loctite applied to the screws at the very least. I personally had a FSB of this type that would rotate during heavy firing sessions. If you choose to replace your factory FSB you may want to look into having your new one pinned as well. Most competent armorers are able to perform this modification on most FSB's/GB's.
The bayonet lug is another one of those "male nipple" features like the M203 notch and doesn't benefit most civilian users. While it may be more aesthetically pleasing than the look of a neutered, post-ban FSB it really serves no purpose on a 16" barreled AR15 since you can't mount a bayonet on it anyways.
Now I'll move on to the gas system. There are several different length gas systems on the market right now. Rifle length, which is usually on a 20"+ barrel such as the M16 A1, A2, etc.; carbine length is featured on the M4; and mid-length, which isn't currently fielded on any standard issue military weapons, but seems to serve most end-users very well. Most AR15's seem to feature the carbine-length gas system, although the mid-length is gaining quite a following right now. There are arguments to validate any of these systems depending on which side of the fence you're on. Knight's Armament actually has an outstanding proprietary length system that is featured on their SR15/SR16 line of carbines.
A rifle-length gas system can be equipped with about a 12" handguard or rail with no modification to the FSB; a mid-length gas system can be equipped with about a 9" handguard or rail without modifying the FSB; and a carbine-length gas system can accomodate about a 7" handguard or rail without modification to its FSB. Daniel Defense manufactures an excellent extended rail system (see pic below) that has an opening from which the factory FSB can protrude. This means you don't have to spend extra dough modifying or replacing parts. A few other manufacturers are beginning to follow DD's lead as well.
![]()
If you look back up at the first picture you will notice that that barrel profile becomes skinny underneath the handguards. This is a weight-saving measure that may shave a few ounces off of your carbine. It may not sound like a lot, but ounces add up to pounds pretty quickly when you begin mounting items to the front of your rifle such as suppressors, flashlights, bayonets, forward grips, NV aiming devices, etc. There is also what is called the SOCOM profile, which is very similar to the M4 profile (M203 notch, skinny underneath the handguards) except that it stays fat underneath the handguards. A lot of quality manufacturers are starting to make lightweight barrels (AKA skinny bbl, pencil bbl, etc.) that have a continuous thin profile that shaves even more weight than the M4 profile. There are always arguments against this concerning barrel heat, but unless you are performing full mag dumps from your Beta C-Mag on a regular basis I don't think it's really a big issue. Another argument concerns barrel whip. I won't get into that as it is outside my area of knowledge, but you can use your Google-Fu to research that subject if it concerns you. I, personally, plan to eventually try out a pencil barrel since, as a grunt, I'm a big fan of lighter gear.
The mil-spec barrel twist rate is 1/7, or 1 complete turn every 7" through the bore. This twist rate is more ideal for stabilizing longer bullets such as 75gr TAP or 77gr MK262. Many AR manufacturers choose to equip their product with 1/9 barrels as well. This twist rate seems to be more ideal for stabilizing shorter, lighter projectiles such as varmint rounds in the 40-50gr range, 55gr M193, and even 62gr M855. Different users have different results, though. I will probably catch some flak for saying this, but I will anyways. It seems to me that in some cases 1/9 twist is an indicator that the mfg. may have cut corners in other areas such as chamber dimensions, chrome lining, barrel steel, MPI, and proof testing. This brings me to my next point...
Chrome-lined barrels. If you are shopping for a firearm that will see serious use and maybe even some abuse there is no reason not to have a chrome-lined barrel. It is more durable (this means more barrel life and more for your money) and more resistant to the elements than chrome-moly or non-chrome-lined barrels. Some argue that you can squeeze more accuracy out of a non-chromed barrel, but remember that the mil-spec is a set of criteria. If the weapon that you're considering adheres closely to the TDP it will not be an inaccurate weapon by any means. It must be capable of at least 4 MOA with mil-spec ammunition. This is combat-accurate and I can say that I have seen Marines qualify "Expert" on the rifle range shooting targets as far as 500 meters with iron-sighted M4's. I have also heard of instances (from reliable sources) where SOF soldiers acheived hits on point targets with their M4's past 500 meters.


4Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote


, forward grips, NV aiming devices, etc. There is also what is called the SOCOM profile, which is very similar to the M4 profile (M203 notch, skinny underneath the handguards) except that it stays fat underneath the handguards. A lot of quality manufacturers are starting to make lightweight barrels (AKA skinny bbl, pencil bbl, etc.) that have a continuous thin profile that shaves even more weight than the M4 profile. There are always arguments against this concerning barrel heat, but unless you are performing full mag dumps from your Beta C-Mag on a regular basis I don't think it's really a big issue. Another argument concerns barrel whip. I won't get into that as it is outside my area of knowledge, but you can use your Google-Fu to research that subject if it concerns you. I, personally, plan to eventually try out a pencil barrel since, as a grunt, I'm a big fan of lighter gear.









