this post is based on information received from individuals more knowledgable than I.
Threads on mil-spec receiver extensions are created using the rolled-thread process. This process does not cut any material out to create the threads (which would create stresses in the material). Instead, existing material is extruded to create them. This is the reason that mil-spec tubes are a slightly smaller diameter than their threads. From what I understand the rolled-thread process creates stronger threads than the cut-thread process (the process used to create threads on commercial tubes). My father was a machinist in the Marine Corps as well as the civilian world and he agrees with this assessment. I'm not sure, however, how negligible or significant the difference in strength is. I apologize for not having any sources handy at the moment. If you do some searching on everyspec.com, though, you may be able to find something more solid than this.
The following link compares rolled and cut threading on bolts and screws. Although they are not speaking specifically about receiver extensions, some of the information is still applicable. http://www.portlandbolt.com/faqs/rol...-threads-bolts


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote

