Smith & Wesson Model 586, 4" barrel, nickel plated, .357 magnum/.38 Special caliber (photo found online)
Colt Python, 4" barrel, nickel plated, .357 magnum/.38 Special caliber (photo found online)
How does a Smith & Wesson Model 586 compare to a Colt Python (assume the same barrel lenghts, caliber and finish).
Accuracy?
Reliability?
Fit & Finish?
Durability?
Trigger pull (DA and SA)?
Balance?
Perceived recoil?
Availability of parts?
Difficulty in repairing?
I have never handled a Python; I have handled (but not shot) a S&W 586. The S&W has an excellent trigger, both SA and DA.
To an untrained eye, the S&W 586 and Colt Python look much alike. They are both attractive six-shot SA/DA large frame revolvers, chambered in .357 magnum/.38 Special, both with 4" barrels, both nickel plated, both wearing wood stocks. Of course, the S&W 586 cylinder revolves the wrong way, and the S&W cylinder latch operates backwards.
Money is not part of the question. The Python costs quite a lot more than the S&W 586. I took finish, barrel length and caliber out of the question. Let's make the S&W pre-lock, so the S&W internal lock is not part of the question either.
Another way to put it is: If one does not want to (or cannot) spend as much as is necessary to purchase a Python, is a S&W 586 a good "replacement" for the Python?
Let's start the opinions flying! Toss in some facts, if you have some to support your opinions.
Please don't flame me. A LOT of you guys own S&Ws

as well as Colts


; some of you own Glocks


!
;
This is NOT a Chevy vs. Ford debate.
Chevy is far better than Ford Always has been; Always will be. Case closed.