I don't know about you but this has me a little concerned.

[d.a.r.y.l]

I stand corrected on my statement.

[taptap]

You are correct. International treaties require a senate two thirds majority and the president to ratify. The house of representatives has no vote.

Thanks I was feeling pretty confident of that. I would hope that 2-3rds vote would be a formidable obstacle.

[Colt75]

I have more important things to worry about - like how to finance my next Colt.

[dfariswheel]

What the scare mongers fail to say is that no treaty, even if confirmed by the Senate, can over ride the US constitution.

The Constitution reigns supreme, and no law or treaty can override it. Since there is a Second Amendment, and the Supreme court has ruled that it does guarantee individual rights to own guns, a treaty or law banning gun ownership would be null and void.

[guy sajer]

This is old news. Started when Clinton was president. Tried to bring the United States under the UN umbrella for arms control. Thats why gun rights is a never ending battle of its own.

Yes .