+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Cap
    Cap is offline
    Member Cap is on a distinguished road

    Member #
    1758
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    34
    Liked
    0 times

    lead vs. jacketed same recipe?

    I generally load a 200 gr. MontanaGold jacketed flat point in my 1911 Gov't. using 4.7 - 5.1 gr. of Titegroup. I recently purchased a Para P14 from a fellow shooter who recommended using 4.4 gr. of Clays with a 200 gr. LSW (his favorite load) in this gun.

    My question is can I use the 4.4 gr. of Clays with my JFP bullets without a problem? I would start there, chrono it and go from there to achieve the velocity I'm looking for. BTW Hodgdon does not provide info on this bullet/powder combo.

    Thanks
    Cap

  2. #2
    Senior Member haggis is on a distinguished road

    Member #
    5371
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Aiken, SC
    Posts
    831
    Liked
    25 times
    It usually requires less powder for lead bullets than jacketed ones of the same weight and shape to get the to same velocity. For example, Titegroup - 4.4 gr for 230 gr lead = 4.8gr for 230 gr jacketed. Bullet shape (really bullet surface contact area with bore) has some effect, i.e., 200 gr LRNFP (smaller contact area) requires more powder for the same velocity as 200 gr LSWC (larger area).

    BTW, 4.4 gr Clays w/ 200gr JHP is 0.1 gr over maximum load. Start at 3.9 gr and work up. Maximum velocities will be considerably less than with Titegroup. You won't make Major power factor in IDPA/USPSA.

    Check here:
    http://www.hodgdon.com/

    Buck
    Last edited by haggis; 01-08-2011 at 08:41 PM.

  3. #3
    Cap
    Cap is offline
    Member Cap is on a distinguished road

    Member #
    1758
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    34
    Liked
    0 times
    Thanks for the reply Buck

    I had checked hodgdon's site but I must have selected an incorrect search term as I did not see data for the 200 gr. bullet. Just checked again and you are quite correct. This raises another question. As reported on the Brian Enos forum, a large number of USPSA shooters are using Clays with 200 gr. jacketed bullets and making major with 4.4 gr. Here's a quote from an USPSA shooter on that forum.

    "The load I use for 200gr MG JFP is 4.7grs of Clays, with an OAL of 1.21 and Federal Primers. This makes 174PF in my STI Sentry. 4.6grs makes 170PF and 4.8grs makes 176PF.

    The hodgdon data for a 200 gr. JHP is for a COAL of 1.155" but in the 1911 most shooters use a COAL of close to 1.225" or so.
    Last edited by Cap; 01-10-2011 at 09:50 AM.

  4. #4
    Member LeMat is on a distinguished road

    Member #
    4957
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NW Montana
    Posts
    55
    Liked
    0 times
    Just wanted to chime in and say that when I was shooting USPSA, I was loading those same bullets with 4.7gr of Clays.

    What was really nice though, is that Montana Gold is only 7 miles down the road and I was able to go in and purchase "seconds".

    It's been a few years since then and I'm not sure they do that anymore.
    "I'd rather depend on a well practiced trustworthy soul with a Kel-Tec than an interweb wonder with a decked out super-gun."
    -1911Forum member SCW


 

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search tags for this page

.510 jacketed bullets
,
230 montana gold titegroup
,

4.7 gr clays

,
4.7 gr. titegroup 200 loads
,
clay vs. titegroup
,
clays vs titegroup
,
jacketed vs lead
,
jacketed vs. lead powder loads
,
lead jacketed
,
lead vs jacketed
,
lead vs jacketed for idpa
,

lead vs jacketed load data

,

lead vs jacketed powder loads

,
lswc vs lrnfp
,
major power factor titegroup 230gr
,
montana gold 200gr jfp bullseye
,
montana gold bullets load data
,
powder data lead vs jacketed
,
recipe tite group
,
reloading lead vs jacketed
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.4
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
We are not associated with Colt's Manufacturing LLC. We are an enthusiast site comprised of Colt Fans.