not a Colt Navy
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: not a Colt Navy

  1. #11
    Junior Member

    Member #
    51530
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    37
    Liked
    34 times
    ok - received the mystery revolver in the mail. More photos.

    The grip angle is ever so slightly swept back; when the butt is flat on the table the muzzle is raised by maybe a few (under 5 but definitely not parallel) degrees.
    The barrel has what look like the striations of the twisted iron but nothing discernible on the cylinder. But it's so worn, pitted I can't really tell. The grip is obviously 2 piece and no markings on the wood inside or out. The main spring has also been replaced (and the screw) obviously at some point. There are stamps on the grip frame sides, a "R" and a "3." The underside has the 2 last SNs also. Nothing else on the loading lever or barrel underside. The barrel wedge looks like a simple cut bar steel replacement and its screw might be modern also but the rest of the screws seem period...whatever that period may be.

    So what do you all think?

    56623245_1956120717850495_7401303608307744768_n.jpg56675773_2424117497607119_164981320315830272_n.jpg56706146_260265641419134_4945030490538115072_n.jpg56726483_3863696266981265_8797008103645118464_n.jpg56764434_464829377592272_2851189820129017856_n.jpg

  2. #12

  3. #13
    Senior Member

    Member #
    26323
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    SE LA
    Posts
    937
    Liked
    594 times
    It looks like an early Replica Arms G&G copy which has been aged. The S/N# stampings are more defined than the condition of the rest of the gun.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    ColtForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #14
    Senior Member

    Member #
    26323
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    SE LA
    Posts
    937
    Liked
    594 times
    I’d have to look, but I also don’t believe original Griswold’s had the Colt-type cap groove machined into the top of their recoil shields. Pretty sure they had a flat surface.

  6. #15
    Senior Member

    Member #
    28879
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    338
    Liked
    106 times
    "Confederate Revolvers" (Bill Gary) and "Confederate Handguns" (William Albaugh) both show photos of G&G's with and without a cap groove. In fact, Albaugh shows a photo of #1037 and #1038 together, right side view. #1037 has no cap groove while #1038 has a cap groove. These were basically hand-made guns so there were probably other differences.

    Jim

  7. #16
    Senior Member

    Member #
    28166
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    866
    Liked
    501 times
    Is that a brass screw in the bottom of the frame/trigger guard? Is there a crack in it? And a crack in the backstrap ear? Old brass cracks. The screws look handmade. I would check the threads. The hammer and trigger guard are both weirdly shaped. I am no expert but if this is fake it's a really good one.

  8. #17
    Senior Member

    Member #
    43665
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,051
    Liked
    617 times
    The mainspring was made from clock spring, it looks like.

  9. #18
    Senior Member

    Member #
    3122
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    970
    Liked
    1113 times
    Old guns (up to 1870 or later) are iron, later guns are steel (Colt SAA, 1894?). A "steel/iron proof specialist" can find the difference.

    I think jplower can help
    Last edited by hmaag; 04-16-2019 at 05:27 AM.
    Hans Maag, Switzerland

  10. #19
    Senior Member

    Member #
    26323
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    SE LA
    Posts
    937
    Liked
    594 times
    Tell you what, though, if it turns out to be a real Griswold purchased at an old Colt price, you made out like a bandit. Cross fingers....

  11. #20
    Senior Member

    Member #
    1682
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    233
    Liked
    167 times
    I have owned an original Griswold in the past, and this one looks quite legit. It has the characteristics, markings, and aging I would expect; and it's definitely not made from anything Italian. If it's a copy, it's time to get out of the hobby.
    Last edited by herd118; 04-16-2019 at 11:40 AM.
    ei8ht likes this.


 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Colt 1861 Navy Navy Conversion
    By jcmh1 in forum Colt Percussion Revolvers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-29-2018, 06:24 PM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-15-2018, 04:24 PM
  3. 1851 Colt Navy-Navy revlover
    By merrell02 in forum Colt Percussion Revolvers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-24-2017, 03:29 AM
  4. A confusing 1851 Navy/Navy Colt
    By Coltaholic in forum Colt Percussion Revolvers
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-16-2014, 09:13 PM
  5. It is not a disease, it is not a disease, it is not a disease.
    By oberon in forum Colt Semiauto Pistols
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-16-2014, 06:29 AM
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
We are not associated with Colt's Manufacturing LLC. We are an enthusiast site comprised of Colt Fans.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.