Colt '51 Navy Cylinder Stamp
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By fingersmcgee

Thread: Colt '51 Navy Cylinder Stamp

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Member #
    36649
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    232
    Liked
    208 times

    Colt '51 Navy Cylinder Stamp

    This is on Gun Broker now: https://www.gunbroker.com/item/819528522

    On photo 4 of 4 is a view of the cylinder, and right below the s/n it has stamped (on the cylinder) "PAT SEPT 20 1853". Has anyone ever seen this info on a cylinder before?

    It is a squareback, so maybe it was some kind of early production aberration. None of my squarebacks has this, but one does have "COLTS PATENT" stamped on the right side of the frame.

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Member #
    24329
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Four Seasons, Missouri
    Posts
    462
    Liked
    184 times
    My 2nd year Navy SN: 16XXX has 'Engraved by Ormsby' stamped in that location.
    DEFINITIONS:

    Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Ambrose Bierce

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Member #
    28879
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    338
    Liked
    105 times
    I am not an expert by any means, but to me it is very spurious. All hand stamped, not in line, and in different fonts. I might suggest that it is a home gunsmith special from the 1920's-1930's when those guns were worth about cents on the dollar. I find nothing in Swayze's book about such a stamping.

    Regards,

    Jim

  4. Remove Advertisements
    ColtForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Supporting Member
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    30344
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    460
    Liked
    96 times
    It is in excellent condition?? The thing is rusted. IMHO this makes for at best a "Good" condition rating, which does not justify the minimum bid.
    I am a novice collector of Colt firearms. Recently, I have been focusing on antique firearms. Here is a link to some of my "gems":
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. #5
    Junior Member

    Member #
    50313
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    31
    Liked
    23 times
    Quote Originally Posted by r010159 View Post
    It is in excellent condition?? The thing is rusted. IMHO this makes for at best a "Good" condition rating, which does not justify the minimum bid.
    Butt ugly non Colt markings on that cylinder - just my humble opinion


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #6
    Jpn
    Jpn is offline
    Junior Member

    Member #
    56585
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    28
    Liked
    14 times
    The barrel address is wrong...should be a two-line New York, I think.

  8. #7
    Senior Member

    Member #
    62946
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    197
    Liked
    135 times
    Another questionable offering waiting for a sucker to jump on it. Also $69.00 shipping and insurance? I don't think so!

  9. #8
    Junior Member

    Member #
    8946
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    94
    Liked
    29 times
    Little seems right on this gun. The front sight appears to be wrong, the cylinder markings are all wrong and the barrel address looks more like a 2d generation than a first generation. I also believe that the frame screws and the wedge are way too nice looking to be original. I agree with the other assessments regarding the serial number. Pictures are poor, but the aging on the pistol appears to be a little too even for me. If I were at home I'd pull my reference books. I believe this may be a fake. Besides, if you are asking this much money, you would think more and better quality photos would be provided up front.

  10. #9
    Senior Member

    Member #
    36649
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    232
    Liked
    208 times
    Quote Originally Posted by Jpn View Post
    The barrel address is wrong...should be a two-line New York, I think.
    The barrel address is correct as a one line, but since these squarebacks were only produced in 1850 and 1851 who put a patent date of 1853 on that cylinder? Would not have been done by Colt -- they already had "COLT'S PATENT" stamped on the frame.

  11. #10
    Senior Member

    Member #
    24329
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Four Seasons, Missouri
    Posts
    462
    Liked
    184 times
    Using Swayze as a reference, the barrel is totally wrong for a 4 digit 2nd model.

    A second model Navy (SN under 4200) would have had the early --- ADDRESS SAMl COLT NEW YORK CTY --- not the late address of --ADDRESS COL SMl COLT NEW - YORK U.S. AMERICA -- of the fourth models

    Barrel has the thick lug found on the middle third models.

    It has the beveled loading notch found on the middle third models.
    Berkeley492 likes this.
    DEFINITIONS:

    Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Ambrose Bierce


 

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
We are not associated with Colt's Manufacturing LLC. We are an enthusiast site comprised of Colt Fans.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.