Colt Forum banner

After market magazines Colt Hammerless 1903 32

944 Views 10 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  centag
This thread started out to be about original versus aftermarket magazines.

But when I photographed mine I realized that the mag was indeed not original. It works well but there is no brand name.

Having heard horror stories about how poor some aftermarket magazine perform I am now asking what should I shop for and what to avoid?



Gun Firearm Trigger Gun accessory Gun barrel


Font
See less See more
2
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
The magazines sold by U.S. Armaments work great.

Attachments

See less See more
2
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I guess I will have to check mine, I just figured they were all reproductions.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
The magazines sold by U.S. Armaments work great.
Thanks Redcat,

That is good enough for me. I have ordered 2 of them at $36.00 each. Sure beats paying $250.00 or higher for two.



Oh, and to the Forum member who PMed me with the generous offer of an old aftermarket magazine for $50, no thank you sir. :)
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Somebody school me here.
That magazine looks right to me.
All blue, crimped, square top, and correctly marked would be correct in a 1927 model M.
If it isn't OE, then what is it, and how do you make that determination?
  • Like
Reactions: 4


How thick are the baseplates on the new US Armaments magazines?

I have an early one and the baseplate is thinner than on the originals.

That makes for questionable functioning, at least in this case.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
My original Colt magazine baseplate measures .0705" and my 2016 US Armaments baseplate is .0545". So there is a difference but not one that has caused problems in my pistol.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
This thread started out to be about original versus aftermarket magazines.

But when I photographed mine I realized that the mag was indeed not original. It works well but there is no brand name.

Having heard horror stories about how poor some aftermarket magazine perform I am now asking what should I shop for and what to avoid?



View attachment 396489

View attachment 396481



Your magazine is a factory magazine, all blue, square front edge, with crimped construction. According to Brunner, correct for the 1903 M from 1938, sn 535000, forward. The magazine is not correct for your 1926 production pistol, but it is a factory magazine.
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Your magazine is a factory magazine, all blue, square front edge, with crimped construction. According to Brunner, correct for the 1903 M from 1938, sn 535000, forward. The magazine is not correct for your 1926 production pistol, but it is a factory magazine.
I stand corrected, re-educated and more careful with my research.
No doubt, I referenced the wrong line when incorrectly specifying it was OK for a 1927. In fact the 1927 magazine would have been a two-tone, and not all blue.

I should always consult and confirm with 2 sources before putting up something that is not true. After further review, Brunner and Lisker are, in fact, in agreement.
Sorry.
This is not the first time I have pulled this particular stunt.
  • Like
Reactions: 4
We are human we all make mistakes, not a problem oberon !
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Somebody school me here.
That magazine looks right to me.
All blue, crimped, square top, and correctly marked would be correct in a 1927 model M.
If it isn't OE, then what is it, and how do you make that determination?
You are correct. I picked it up this evening and it is an original magazine.
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top