Between us, we could arm Josey Wales. Mine was about 10 years earlier, 13K serial range IIRC.
Between us, we could arm Josey Wales. Mine was about 10 years earlier, 13K serial range IIRC.Armi San Marcos made in 1987. They were known for their forged frames. EMF holster…you do not many Walker holsters, “Big Iron” on the hip.
i do miss marty.Armi San Marcos made in 1987. They were known for their forged frames. EMF holster…you do not many Walker holsters, “Big Iron” on the hip.
View attachment 790652
Hi, here are some pics the current owner sent me. Not very clear or detailed but I am meeting him on Saturday and I will take my camera with and get some decent detailed pics. In the meantime: the serial number seems to have been worked on...? Any other comments?Can you post some pictures?
hello, use a non destructive mass spectrometer to analyze the metals. have him remove the walnut handle and look for pencil serial number under the backstrap. i am tossing in my cards, that one is too hard to call by long distance, needs hands on. good luck, you never know till you have all the facts. if you read his own story saml colt's record of producing the 1847, yhere was a discussion about the numbers. there was a change, the dies were returned to the die maker but we are not told what was being used before the dies returned. i do not believe for a new york minute that colt sat on his hands, waiting.Hello All,
I found what appears to be a Walker Colt in a presentation case with all of the extras in it. At face value it seems to be the real thing and it is rather well used and worn. The presentation case has a brass plate with a name engraved on it but it is well polished and almost unreadable. I have a few concerns: for such a "worn" revolver there is absolutely no play on the mechanisms and all it tight, smooth and firm...possible but unlikely. My biggest concern is the serial number (that matches on all of the parts): 317. This is not the number for a Walker series but an Army revolver. This one is definitely a Walker. How can I make sure it is a genuine Walker and not a copy or reproduction that has been made to look old?
hello, also, speak to tom del mar, the premier authority in europe.Hello All,hello
I found what appears to be a Walker Colt in a presentation case with all of the extras in it. At face value it seems to be the real thing and it is rather well used and worn. The presentation case has a brass plate with a name engraved on it but it is well polished and almost unreadable. I have a few concerns: for such a "worn" revolver there is absolutely no play on the mechanisms and all it tight, smooth and firm...possible but unlikely. My biggest concern is the serial number (that matches on all of the parts): 317. This is not the number for a Walker series but an Army revolver. This one is definitely a Walker. How can I make sure it is a genuine Walker and not a copy or reproduction that has been made to look old?
Can you elaborate please? Thank you.If compared to a known original, there seems to be a difference in the back of the cylinder.
View attachment 790792 View attachment 790793
I’m not knowledgeable about Walkers, but like what I see from the pictures. Fingers crossed 🤞. Jonl51Hi, here are some pics the current owner sent me. Not very clear or detailed but I am meeting him on Saturday and I will take my camera with and get some decent detailed pics. In the meantime: the serial number seems to have been worked on...? Any other comments? View attachment 790744 View attachment 790745 View attachment 790746 View attachment 790747 View attachment 790748 View attachment 790748 View attachment 790749 View attachment 790750 View attachment 790751
I have added a third image…the cut out for the nipple is different.If compared to a known original, there seems to be a difference in the back of the cylinder.
View attachment 790792 View attachment 790793 View attachment 790800
He says it was a part exchange for an old rifle. That's all he knows. I'll try to find out where he got it and follow up with that person.Does he seem to have any clue what he MIGHT have? His asking price would indicate he does not. However he somehow established his asking price, based on what?
Hope it’s the real deal in spite of the odds. Good luck. Jonl51
You can look at authentic Walkers that have sold by going to Collectors Firearms.com and searching their archives. Looked quickly at a couple and did not see serial numbers like on yours but didn’t do a “deep dive”. Best Jonl51Hello Again,
Here are some pics the owner sent me. Not very clear but I am seeing him on Saturday and will take my camera and get better pics. Any comments so far will be welcome. The serial number seems suspect?
If you look at the “3” in the serial number of this known example, it has a flat top, whereas the OPs Walker has a rounded “3”.You can look at authentic Walkers that have sold by going to Collectors Firearms.com and searching their archives. Looked quickly at a couple and did not see serial numbers like on yours but didn’t do a “deep dive”.
And that’s your first clue that this example is very likely a fake.He wants about $7500 for it which also seems odd..
Gents,Also, compare the barrel addresses of the OPs revolver and the Danish Sea Captain Colt. The font of the Danish Sea Captain Colt Walker, looking at “NEW - YORK CITY”, is blockier, and NEW and YORK are closer together with a much shorter dash than present on the OPs Colt Walker.
I think, unfortunately, the evidence is suggesting the OPs Colt Walker is not genuine.
He says it was a part exchange for an old rifle. That's all he knows. I'll try to find out where he got it and follow up with that
it does not appear to be a production whitneyville 1847 colt. that has been my perception. however, there are other models to consider. colt had the pattern room at famco turning out, regularly, experimentals. we are not told what experimental if any, were produced at whitneyville. tradition has it that blunt and syms produced at least one prototype of the 1847 nmodel but they were colt's agents and more likely the prototypes all came from paterson.And that’s your first clue that this example is very likely a fake.
When an individual other than a close friend or relative—and, usually, unfortunately, a close friend or relative—presents a Colt Walker for $7500, odds are overwhelmingly in favor of the Colt Walker not being genuine and well overpriced as a reproduction at $7500.