Colt Forum banner
1 - 5 of 59 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
4,684 Posts
I can give you a multitude of reasons why yours is not original, but the easiest thing to begin with is the barrel address. The ones with the heavy dash between “NEW” and “YORK” are 100% fakes. Note the dash on the barrel of this 100% authentic Danish Sea Captain Colt Walker:


The photograph of the barrel address is in the first column, third row.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,684 Posts
Okay here’s a few more differences:

curvature of grip interface at backstrap, frame, and trigger guard differs from original.

Location of wedge not in exactly same location as original.

Cylinder stop differs from original.

Curvature of arc of loading lever and profile of loading lever differs from original.

Loading lever cutout profile differs from original.

Angulation and chamfer of rear part of barrel assembly forward of frame differs from original.

If scene on cylinder was distinct, I’m sure I could point out many ways in which it differs from the cylinder scene of the Danish Sea Captain Colt Walker.

Is further proof necessary?

How much do you have invested in your revolver?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,684 Posts
"Probably" an Armi San Marco reproduction, rather than a fake. Fakes are artificially aged and the numbers will often be re-stamped using the serial numbers of unaccounted for Walkers. The sandpaper/steel wool marks can be seen, with bright metal overall. There is a total absence of patina, in fact it may be unfired. I note rust pitting in the locations where the Italian proof marks would be located. There is absolutely no wear or impact damage to the bolt slots in the cylinder. The good news is that it is made of far better materials than the originals.

However: a great free.99 deal, since good quality reproductions are going for $500 or so.
I agreed with a previous poster that this was an Italian reproduction, not knowing, nor caring, a whit the difference between an Armi San Marco reproduction and an Italian clone. I didn’t know for sure it was an Italian reproduction when I stated that, but, not to sound snobbish, but I simply can’t be bothered to learn all that h nuances between the reproductions. The important thing, to me, is to determine if a Colt Walker can possibly be the real deal, or not. IF there was compelling evidence that a poster presented a Colt Walker that appeared to be genuine, I would refer the poster to contact Herb Glass, Jr of Bullville, New York, for authentication purposes. Sadly, I have never been able to do that on this forum. But I dream of this happening one day, a similar situation to the manner in which this one was discovered:


I use the term “fake” rather loosely, simply to mean in contrast to a genuine Colt Walker revolver dating from 1847. It doesn’t mean the Colt Walker was created intentionally to deceive, but, in contrast to a genuine one. It’s certainly easy enough to fool your friends and neighbors with little effort, if so desired. Purchase any reproduction, bury it in the back yard for a month, dig it up, and it appears genuine to anyone not a firearms nerd.

BTW, it’s tremendous fun to play revolver detective. A welcome respite from my day job.
 
1 - 5 of 59 Posts
Top