Interesting that the illustrations are of an 1851 Navy. The article is written in that colorful style that was popular in its day. It does point out that it is very unlikely that you will hit anything using these techniques.I am working on an article and found an interesting newspaper feature from 1889, well before Hollywood was altering our history.
Well, the guy was a gun writer so that was most likely all he could afford!Interesting that the illustrations are of an 1851 Navy.
Jim
Tie back the hammer? For some kind of early safety zip-tie so it won't fire? !I haven't read the article in the OP yet, so don't know if this "trick" is mentioned or not. But didn't some of the old guys just tie the hammer back on their SAAs? Using a rawhide thong, maybe...wetting it, doing the tie-back, and as the rawhide dried, it became tighter and more secure. Sounds plausible to me.
I think he meant to say trigger, not hammer.Tie back the hammer? For some kind of early safety zip-tie so it won't fire? !
Phillips (Jack Elam) wired the triggers back on his shotgun in "Rio Lobo" if that counts.Oops. Yes. I meant the trigger.
Maybe he was one of those 4-armed Sheriffs from "Cowboys and Aliens."One funny "fanning" account was written in the 1930's.
An article related how there was a question as to how a then-modern cop would fair against an old Western Sheriff in shooting skills.
The test apparently had a newly trained rookie police officer against an old Sheriff and the Sheriff using two guns at the same time.
The article said the rookie out-shot the Sheriff, with the Sheriff "Fanning both guns at the same time".![]()
If u tied the hammer back the gun couldn't be firedI haven't read the article in the OP yet, so don't know if this "trick" is mentioned or not. But didn't some of the old guys just tie the hammer back on their SAAs? Using a rawhide thong, maybe...wetting it, doing the tie-back, and as the rawhide dried, it became tighter and more secure. Sounds plausible to me.