Colt Forum banner

Mauser HSc Pistols

11K views 33 replies 19 participants last post by  ColtTom  
I have one of the 1970 manufactured, Interarms marked HSc's in .380. It is 100% reliable with ball ammo and 90% unreliable with any HP ammo except those with noses that mimic hardball which eliminates most brands. I can tell you that it is not a pleasant gun to shoot. A couple of magazines full and the web of my hand is getting sore. It is not a light gun, I figure it's the grip shape as I have other .380's that are much more comfortable to shoot. It is quite accurate as the factory test target shows and I have demonstrated to myself a few times. That said, I would have no problem carrying it loaded with FMJ's as a CCW. It's just not a fun plinker. Here are a couple of earlier Mauser autos.
 

Attachments

ColtTom, interesting observation about the PPK/S in .380 and not surprising. My Colt M1908, Remington PA51 and Savage 1917 in .380 are both more pleasant to shoot than the HSc. I have a Star Model S in .380 that is a real pussycat compared to the others. I attribute that to the fact that it is a true locked breech design with a tilt down barrel and swinging link just like a miniature 1911 and not a blowback design. The Savage and Remington are not straight blowbacks but are a delayed blowback action. Grip shape and action type seem to have the most effect upon ease of shooting. For comparison, the Remington weighs 21 oz, the HSc and Star both weigh 22 oz, the Savage 23 oz, and the Colt is 24 oz so none of them are particularly lightweight compared to some of the new polymer framed CCW guns on the market.