Colt Forum banner
1 - 20 of 79 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3,919 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Today I received my Casey Inspected Cavalry Model back from Mr Kopec along with his letter. It received a Silver Seal which I was hoping to see. The letter is all good as far as I am concerned. It was exactly what I suspected.. Fist a Couple Pictures Of the gun and then the letter.

Air gun Trigger Revolver Gun barrel Gun accessory


Air gun Trigger Gun barrel Shotgun Gun accessory


Bicycle part Tool Font Automotive exterior Bumper


Composite material Metal Titanium Steel Electric blue


Font Paper Paper product Document Event


Handwriting Font Signature Paper Paper product


Automotive exterior Rectangle Auto part Composite material Rim


Revolver Gun accessory Gun barrel Air gun Metal


Material property Revolver Gun accessory Gun barrel Auto part


Bicycle part Cable Tool Metal Auto part
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,482 Posts
It is a nice looking gun. One thing I question is that he states that because it is still 7 1/2" it has to be a militia gun, and could not be a true Cavalry gun. As if it could not have possibly been stolen by a trooper, kept personally by an officer, or even presented to someone in command, thus escaping the recall.

Something that seems strange, is Kopec says the guns like this were first sold to the public in 1903 in about new condition. Then he narrows the date for refinish to 1906-1907. It seems strange that a new condition gun would show signs of wear and need polishing and a refinish in a couple of years, particularly in an era when these were just working guns, when these guns were sold cheap surplus to people who did not want to pay for a new gun. We will never know, just wonder.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,606 Posts
Today I received my Casey Inspected Cavalry Model back from Mr Kopec along with his letter. It received a Silver Seal which I was hoping to see. The letter is all good as far as I am concerned. It was exactly what I suspected.. Fist a Couple Pictures Of the gun and then the letter.

View attachment 837166

View attachment 837167

View attachment 837168

View attachment 837169

View attachment 837171

View attachment 837173

View attachment 837174

View attachment 837175

View attachment 837176

View attachment 837177
Nice gun and letter! The "T" on the trigger guard may be a major clue as to when it was refinished. I have seen this "T" only on guns produced in late 1906 and during 1907.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,606 Posts
Awesome Colt and letter! Very nice!

What would cause that front drag line on the cylinder? I don't know if there is any part of the action that far forward.
Some dufuss used the wrong screw for the sear & bolt spring. :)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
493 Posts
So, the screw goes into the frame under the front of the cylinder? Sorry, I'm not real familiar with SAA's.
If you are asking about the screwdriver damage referenced in the Kopec letter, the screw is located under the trigger guard, i.e., the trigger guard must be removed to get to it. Otherwise, it is completely out of sight. Hope this answers your question.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,919 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
The trigger / bolt spring screw is under the trigger guard but the hole is drilled though into the opening for the cylinder. Put in the wrong screw and you get a line. Hard to imagine doing this without it binding the cylinder but we have seen too many like this.

John you are right anything is possible and we will never know the exact history of this gun. It falls into a militia range so that may narrow it down a good bit. The gun must not have been in too bad of condition when Colt refinished it as the markings are all there and no pitting shows through and all the parts seem original to the gun. Colt did not redo old marks or inspector marks. All I know is I really like the look with the gun used to a point of showing honest use making the refinish look even better in a way.

What is interesting is that Colt, the manufacturer of the firearm, believed and verified that this 1875 wrought iron gun was safe for use with smokeless powder. In 1906-7, when this gun was presumably refinished and the VP applied, Colt was certainly familiar with the strength of their metals used.
The gun probably went through the process and got test fired and stamped the VP with no real thought by the guy doing it. It does however make for an interesting side note years later.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,075 Posts
The trigger / bolt spring screw is under the trigger guard but the hole is drilled though into the opening for the cylinder. Put in the wrong screw and you get a line. Hard to imagine doing this without it binding the cylinder but we have seen too many like this.

I have often wondered about this.
The scratch does not align with the screw???
 
1 - 20 of 79 Posts
Top