Legal point but it does have to do with guns so I hope it can stay on the forum.
Usually most know, among the many reasons to avoid shooting in an SD crisis unless it's the very last house on the street, is the legal repercussions: that you will be involved in a homicide. I think it's worse than that though. Homicide is not a crime. It's a fact: the death of a person caused by the agency of another person. Weather or not a crime has been committed is a second question.
For instance, driving legally and safely, someone runs out between parked cars at night dressed in black, you slam on the brakes but it's too late, you hit and kill him. That's a homicide. But unlikely that you would be charged with any crime. It would likely be found a crime hadn't occurred.
Self-Defense Killing is different. Self-Defense is a Justification. A Justification is a legally accepted excuse from the crime you ordinarily would be charged with. This is true in NY State (SD as a Justification) but I'm pretty sure it is all over and has been since the Middle Ages.
The crime you would usually be charged with for knowingly and with intent killing someone would be Murder. And you are confessing to murder by telling authorities you did it. (Pretty hard to claim SD if you deny the act.) It will take varying amounts of time to investigate the killing: the incident itself: any witnesses, physical evidence, the autopsy, 911 tape etc., etc. Then more time to investigate the backgrounds of you and the victim. If the victim was your boss who just fired you and everyone at the office heard you screaming repeatedly: "I'll kill you before morning!", and you did kill him that night, well..... you get the picture.
The Police and DA are not investigating all this to prove your claim of Self-Defense, though it will be a theme of the investigation. That's YOUR story, for YOU to substantiate. They're investigating the killing, for one thing to determine if it's murder, the crime which your actions fit.
So, worse than a homicide you're involved in in an SD killing, you are suspected of murder, and have confessed to it and are being investigated for Murder . Until or if they find Self-Defense was justified, that is how you are regarded legally.
So, I'm not a lawyer, but it seems killing someone in SD REALLY should be the last act you have left in the universe and puts you in a worse legal status than I thought, though hopefully a temporary one. But if it's not, if the investigation of the killing does not verify SD, even if it was SD but the evidence doesn't show it, then you will be charged with Murder.
Any thoughts, (including that I have this completely wrong)?
Usually most know, among the many reasons to avoid shooting in an SD crisis unless it's the very last house on the street, is the legal repercussions: that you will be involved in a homicide. I think it's worse than that though. Homicide is not a crime. It's a fact: the death of a person caused by the agency of another person. Weather or not a crime has been committed is a second question.
For instance, driving legally and safely, someone runs out between parked cars at night dressed in black, you slam on the brakes but it's too late, you hit and kill him. That's a homicide. But unlikely that you would be charged with any crime. It would likely be found a crime hadn't occurred.
Self-Defense Killing is different. Self-Defense is a Justification. A Justification is a legally accepted excuse from the crime you ordinarily would be charged with. This is true in NY State (SD as a Justification) but I'm pretty sure it is all over and has been since the Middle Ages.
The crime you would usually be charged with for knowingly and with intent killing someone would be Murder. And you are confessing to murder by telling authorities you did it. (Pretty hard to claim SD if you deny the act.) It will take varying amounts of time to investigate the killing: the incident itself: any witnesses, physical evidence, the autopsy, 911 tape etc., etc. Then more time to investigate the backgrounds of you and the victim. If the victim was your boss who just fired you and everyone at the office heard you screaming repeatedly: "I'll kill you before morning!", and you did kill him that night, well..... you get the picture.
The Police and DA are not investigating all this to prove your claim of Self-Defense, though it will be a theme of the investigation. That's YOUR story, for YOU to substantiate. They're investigating the killing, for one thing to determine if it's murder, the crime which your actions fit.
So, worse than a homicide you're involved in in an SD killing, you are suspected of murder, and have confessed to it and are being investigated for Murder . Until or if they find Self-Defense was justified, that is how you are regarded legally.
So, I'm not a lawyer, but it seems killing someone in SD REALLY should be the last act you have left in the universe and puts you in a worse legal status than I thought, though hopefully a temporary one. But if it's not, if the investigation of the killing does not verify SD, even if it was SD but the evidence doesn't show it, then you will be charged with Murder.
Any thoughts, (including that I have this completely wrong)?