Colt Forum banner

Colt (Cadet)22

10K views 6 replies 5 participants last post by  mag318  
#1 ·
When Colt came out with the Cadet, which I believe was their first striker fired rimfire pistol, they were sued over the name. It was changed to simply Colt 22, made for a few years then dropped. I recently found one NIB for $400 and bought it for my wife. This is a really good rimfire pistol that makes me wonder why did Colt stopped producing it. The grip frame is a combination of stainless steel and polymer with a very comfortable grip. The mag release is above the trigger on the right side and very easy to use once you get use to it.
I realize the days of the old Woodsman series are long gone as they were very expensive pistols to produce. But the Colt 22 had to be relatively inexpensive so why stop making it, did it not sell well? Shooting the Colt 22 is a real pleasure, it's accurate with a good trigger. I would take this pistol over a Ruger Mark 1,2,3 or 4, or a S&W Victory and several other makes. Maybe someday Colt will get into the rimfire market again, and I don't include those Umarex marketed Colts. If any of my fellow forum members ever get a chance to shoot one of these I think you'll feel the same way. If I ever run across another NIB example for the right price I'd buy it in a heartbeat.
 

Attachments

Discussion starter · #7 ·
1BadColt, you should shoot it as they are fun, accurate pistols and striker fired to boot. My Woodsman Sport from 1956 is my hands down favorite 22 pistol, but that pistol has been kept in near pristine condition and I want to keep it that way. I shoot it 3/4 times a year and always at my range so I'm careful not to put any scratches or dings on it. With the Colt (Cadet) 22 I don't worry about babying it like my Woodsman. I just think the Colt 22 was a nice effort by Colt to produce an inexpensive pistol worthy of the Colt name. Being old school I love the Colt build quality that once was with the Woodsman series and they will always be my favorites.
 

Attachments