Colt Forum banner
41 - 53 of 53 Posts
Today a new Colt SAA model P1840 showed up at my door. This is a SAA in .45 Colt with blue/case color finish with black "eagle" grips. The serial number is S92644A. A check of the Colt serial number lookup returned "no data". I called Colt and was told that the gun was made just six months ago in March of 2025.

This is the first new then-current/contemporary production Colt SAA I have bought since about 2012. It just showed up this afternoon, and I have not fired it yet, but so far, I'm impressed. Overall fit and finish is excellent...

Case colors: Great classic Colt case colors. Not Turnbull style, not washed out year-2000 Uberti style, not nasty lizard vomit style (such as Colt had been putting out too frequently in the last 5 or so years.) Just great classic "Colt" style case colors.

Grip fitment: Perfect.

Cylinder timing: Absolutely PERFECT on every chamber. No matter how slowly I cock it, all timing events are absolutely perfect.

Cylinder lockup: Perfect. Zero end shake. Rotational play as close to zero as possible and still have the bolt move properly. Rock solid lockup.

Fitment of backstrap "ears" (with hammer and frame): Excellent. Not perfect, but very good and much better than what has been the norm for most of the last 50 years. Essentially perfect in the top half of this area, and in the lower part of this area the hammer is proud of the ears, but only by a few thousandths. Sometime in the last 10 years someone on here who is / was obsessed with the fitment in this specific area of the gun (weagle99? Cozmo?) got me paying attention to this, which I had never done before...and now I'm obsessed too! LOL!

Trigger guard and backstrap fit to frame: Perfect.

Trigger pull: Somewhat heavy, but crisp.

Mainspring: Heavy by "modern" standards. At least as heavy as factory 3rd gens of the late 1970s, probably a little heavier. Similar to 1st gens from mid 1890s to 1910 period. Still lighter than 1st gens from the 1870s and 1880s.

Some people may find the heavy mainspring and trigger combination to be objectionable. I do not. I actually like it. It feels more "real" when handling it. Whatever that means. More solid and substantial somehow. Both the hammer draw weight and the feel and weight of the trigger pull do feel more authentically like a 1st gen gun, which I like. Both can be lightened of course if people prefer lighter weights. By comparison, check out a late model Pietta clone such as imported by Cimarron or EMF ("Great Western II") in the last few years. They are so light and slick that to me they seem like toys, or like something is broken or otherwise wrong with them. To each his own.

The last (then) current production SAAs I bought before this one were all from the 2009 to 2015 period, what I think of as the "Brent Turchi Era" at Colt (one of the few good ones for Colt in the last 40 years.) If this new gun is representative of the SAAs Colt is turning out currently, now may be a good time to buy a new SAA!

The real test of course is how does it shoot. I have not found that out yet, but hope to do so soon. In the meantime, here are some photos:

View attachment 987887

View attachment 987884

View attachment 987883

View attachment 987882

View attachment 987886

View attachment 987885

View attachment 987879

View attachment 987881

View attachment 987880
Very encouraging. Thank you for the review.
 
Today a new Colt SAA model P1840 showed up at my door. This is a SAA in .45 Colt with blue/case color finish with black "eagle" grips. The serial number is S92644A. A check of the Colt serial number lookup returned "no data". I called Colt and was told that the gun was made just six months ago in March of 2025.

This is the first new then-current/contemporary production Colt SAA I have bought since about 2012. It just showed up this afternoon, and I have not fired it yet, but so far, I'm impressed. Overall fit and finish is excellent...

Case colors: Great classic Colt case colors. Not Turnbull style, not washed out year-2000 Uberti style, not nasty lizard vomit style (such as Colt had been putting out too frequently in the last 5 or so years.) Just great classic "Colt" style case colors.

Grip fitment: Perfect.

Cylinder timing: Absolutely PERFECT on every chamber. No matter how slowly I cock it, all timing events are absolutely perfect.

Cylinder lockup: Perfect. Zero end shake. Rotational play as close to zero as possible and still have the bolt move properly. Rock solid lockup.

Fitment of backstrap "ears" (with hammer and frame): Excellent. Not perfect, but very good and much better than what has been the norm for most of the last 50 years. Essentially perfect in the top half of this area, and in the lower part of this area the hammer is proud of the ears, but only by a few thousandths. Sometime in the last 10 years someone on here who is / was obsessed with the fitment in this specific area of the gun (weagle99? Cozmo?) got me paying attention to this, which I had never done before...and now I'm obsessed too! LOL!

Trigger guard and backstrap fit to frame: Perfect.

Trigger pull: Somewhat heavy, but crisp.

Mainspring: Heavy by "modern" standards. At least as heavy as factory 3rd gens of the late 1970s, probably a little heavier. Similar to 1st gens from mid 1890s to 1910 period. Still lighter than 1st gens from the 1870s and 1880s.

Some people may find the heavy mainspring and trigger combination to be objectionable. I do not. I actually like it. It feels more "real" when handling it. Whatever that means. More solid and substantial somehow. Both the hammer draw weight and the feel and weight of the trigger pull do feel more authentically like a 1st gen gun, which I like. Both can be lightened of course if people prefer lighter weights. By comparison, check out a late model Pietta clone such as imported by Cimarron or EMF ("Great Western II") in the last few years. They are so light and slick that to me they seem like toys, or like something is broken or otherwise wrong with them. To each his own.

The last (then) current production SAAs I bought before this one were all from the 2009 to 2015 period, what I think of as the "Brent Turchi Era" at Colt (one of the few good ones for Colt in the last 40 years.) If this new gun is representative of the SAAs Colt is turning out currently, now may be a good time to buy a new SAA!

The real test of course is how does it shoot. I have not found that out yet, but hope to do so soon. In the meantime, here are some photos:

View attachment 987887

View attachment 987884

View attachment 987883

View attachment 987882

View attachment 987886

View attachment 987885

View attachment 987879

View attachment 987881

View attachment 987880
It's a Beauty! Enjoy!
 
The reason they reduced the ears is to allow better access for screw removal. How many of those deep ear recesses have been seen with scored edges and finish wear due to screwdrivers hitting. Poor design!

This looks much much better 😍
That happens when you use a Craftsman, etc, screwdriver.
 
I know that now, and amost any year for the past 7 to 10 years I've found SAAs that I wanted, but I'm not tied to a particular year.
[snip]
It can be done, you have to be a hard looker, patient, and flexible. Not looking for a unicorn.
[snip]
Your pockets must be full of 4 leaf clovers.

I concede, availability varies based on region, time of year, etc. Fellows like my uncle always found great deals in part because he spent 4+ hours a day cruising pawn shops over three states. I haven’t had that sort of free time, which translates to higher costs, less perceived availability.

I am also not really a collector, at least not of pistols. Ideally, I wanted a nickel Frontier Six Shooter, 3rd gen, with real ivory grips. Now that is more of a unicorn.

My Standard Mfg 44-40 is nickel with one piece walnut grips, and a 7 1/2 bbl. I would’ve bought a Colt, regardless of grips, regardless of finish, and regardless of barrel length. My USFA 44-40 is blue and color case-hardened. I think I’ve been reasonably flexible; I am not trying to outfit a cavalry unit or have an example of large swaths of Colt’s catalog. I am being hyperbolic, there are other hobbies (photography for example) where I am on the other side of that line. Obviously, your broader interest in SAAs means more of what you see falls within your scope.
 
Interestingly I have a photography - historic interest too. I do wetplate collodion (from quarterplate to mammoth plates), large format film, some 35mm (rangefinders from the 1930s-1950s). I have a very large collection of rare brass lenses from the 1840s-1920s. Way too many.... Also into single shot rifles, some .22s, target type, etc.
 
Hard to find a Saa under 2g I've been checking gun broker. My last buy was a 71/2 357 NRA Commertive. In very nice condition with box just under 2g. Now am searching for a22lr Peacemaker 43/4 barrel.
My last purchase was last year when I bought a New 357 Magnum New Frontier SAA new in the box nickel plated and 7 1/2" barrel for $1580 and $20 FFL fee when it arrived. The original buyer didn't fire it or rotate the cylinder. It came in a Colt wooden presentation box with all of the OEM paperwork. I think Cherry's runs a pretty good business.
Image
 
The New Frontier. When You want a SAA with better sights for less money. If Colt had reintroduced it as the Flat Top Target, I think it would be a whole different story.

And I mean, same gun (New Frontier), different name (Flat Top). It's a funny world.
 
41 - 53 of 53 Posts